Journal of Oral Health and Community Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2013 ) > List of Articles


Priority of Prosthodontic Need Assessment: Functional vs Other Quality of Life Needs – A Quality of Life Assessment Using APS-ARG QOL(DS) – A Pilot Project

V Arora, DK Nath, G Bagchi, M Nath, B Kahar, RB Gaunkar

Citation Information : Arora V, Nath D, Bagchi G, Nath M, Kahar B, Gaunkar R. Priority of Prosthodontic Need Assessment: Functional vs Other Quality of Life Needs – A Quality of Life Assessment Using APS-ARG QOL(DS) – A Pilot Project. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2013; 7 (2):95-100.

DOI: 10.5005/johcd-7-2-95

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-05-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; The Author(s).



Restoration of functional ability is the topmost priority on the mind of a prosthodontist, however, functional restoration alone does not fulfil the treatment needs of a patient.

Material & Method

A 20-item scale for understanding quality of life related to prosthodontic treatment needs was tested for internal consistency and usefulness in understanding the priorities of treatment needs of patients. The scale was administered to 30 patients, mostly in the elderly age group (Mean age 59.43±10.28 years) seeking prosthodontic rehabilitation at Chandra Dental College and Hospital, Barabanki (U.P.), India. On testing the internal consistency of the scale, it was found to be reliable (Cronbach alpha 0.711).


Though functional needs emerged as the topmost priority for patients yet emotional needs were found to be as much important while social needs and financial needs occupied the lower tiers on the hierarchy of treatment needs. The differences in relative importance of different dimensions were well explained and were found to be logical.


The scale was found to be a useful utility in quantification of prosthodontic need and in order to understand the prosthodontic need beyond considerations of fulfilment of functional disability alone.

PDF Share
  1. An epidemiological survey using the Treatment Priority Index (TPI). European Journal of Orthodontics 1998;20:189–93.
  2. Normative and self-perceived orthodontic treatment need of a Peruvian university population. Head Face Med 2006;2:22.
  3. The development and evaluation of an instrument to assess the adverse effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Final Report 2001
  4. The 15-D Measure of Health Related Quality of Life: Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity of its Health State Descriptive System. Centre for Program Evaluation Working Paper #14, October, 1994.
  5. Patients‘ and nurses’ perceptions of symptom distress in cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1989;14:840–46.
  6. Factors which influence how nurses communicate with cancer patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1991;16:677–88.
  7. What outcomes to measure in routine mental health services, and how to assess them – a systematic review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2002;36:743–53.
  8. Immediate versus Delayed Implants. Thesis for MDS (Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery), Faizabad University, 2008.
  9. A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology 1932;140:1–55.
  10. Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
  11. Loneliness, depression and sociability in old age. Ind Psychiatry J 2009;18:51–55.
  12. Physical Needs and Adjustments Made by the Elderly. Stud Home Comm Sci 2009;3(2):115–21.
  13. Age and depression. J Health Soc Behav 1992; 33(3):187–205.
  14. Minimum Sample Size for Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha: A Monte-Carlo Study. HU Journal of Education 2008;35:397–405.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.