Journal of Oral Health and Community Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2012 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Prosthetically Driven Implant Placement with Immediate Function in the Esthetic Zone - A Case Report

Kaushal Luthra, Sarita Luthra

Citation Information : Luthra K, Luthra S. Prosthetically Driven Implant Placement with Immediate Function in the Esthetic Zone - A Case Report. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2012; 6 (2):104-108.

DOI: 10.5005/johcd-6-2-104

License: NA

Published Online: 01-05-2016

Copyright Statement:  NA


Abstract

A waiting period of two weeks after osteotomy increases the surrounding tissue activity to its maximum level as collagen formation and neo-angiogenesis represents a relaxed and acceptable implant bed configuration. In this case delayed implant placement protocol and conventional implant placement was followed with immediate function of esthetics, phonetics and comfort with implant restoration in the esthetic zone with minimal invasive approach. Early osteotomy with delayed implant placement showed lesser bone resorption and higher success rates than conventional implant placement.


PDF Share
  1. Three Dimensional Placement of Implants In Davarpanah M. Immediate Loading of Dental Implants: Theory and Clinical Practice. Pg 45, Chicago, Quintessence, 2002.
  2. Present Status of Immediate Loading of Oral Implants. J Oral Implantol 2004;30:189–97.
  3. Delayed Method of Implantation Enhances Implant Bone Binding: A Comparison with the Conventional Method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:415–20.
  4. Anterior Single-Tooth Implant Restorations: Clinical Rules for Reducing Risk Factors. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70(1):53–57.
  5. Optimizing Esthetics for Implant Restorations in the Anterior Maxilla: Anatomic and Surgical Considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:489–99.
  6. Radiographic Determinants of Implant Performance. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:136–45.
  7. Flapless Dental Implant Placement. J Oral Implantol 2007;33:75–83.
  8. Immediate Loading in the Maxilla Using Flapless Surgery, Implants Placed in Predetermined Positions, and Prefabricated Provisional Restorations: A Retrospective 3-Year Clinical Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5 Suppl 1:29–36.
  9. Immediate Provisional Restoration of Osseotite Implants: A Clinical Report of 18-month Results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:534–41.
  10. Diagnostic Parameters for Monitoring Peri-Implant Conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 (Suppl):116–27.
  11. Peri-implant Tissue Health in Reconstructed Atrophic Papillae. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1999;26:464–74.
  12. An Implant is not a Tooth: a Comparison of Periodontal Indexes. Misch CE, in Dental Implant Prosthetics. Mosby 2005:P18–31
  13. Radiographic Evaluation Of Marginal Bone Levels Around Implants with Different Neck Designs After one Year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;20:789–94.
  14. Rationale for Application of Immediate Load in Implant Dentistry: Part I. Implant Dent 2004;13:207–17.
  15. Rationale of Dental Implants: Misch CE, in Dental Implant Prosthetics. Mosby 2005:1–17.
  16. Thermal Injury to Bone. A Vital Microscopic Description of Heat Effects. Int J Oral Surg 1982;11:115–21.
  17. Early Osteotomy with Delayed Implant Placement: A Step Further for Immediate Loading. Implant Dent 2006;15:18–21.
  18. Flapless implant surgery: A 10-year clinical Retrospective Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:271–76.
  19. Minimally Invasive Flapless Implant Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1:S21–27.
  20. Critical Review of Immediate Loading. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:515–27.
  21. Two Stage IMZ Implants and ITI Implants Inserted in a Single Stage Procedure. A prospective Comparative Study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13:371–380.
  22. Histomorphometric Analysis of an Immediate Non-Functional Loaded Implant in Dogs. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 34.
  23. Prosthetic Management of Implants in the Esthetic Zone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19Suppl:62–72.
  24. Peri-Implant Probing: Positive and Negatives. Implant Dent 2002;11(4):356–61.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.