Journal of Oral Health and Community Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2019 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Comparative Evaluation of Tooth Size Discrepancies in Different Types of Malocclusions by using Bolton's Analysis: An Odontometric Study

Harshala S Patil, Amit S Handa, Uddhav Y Alane

Keywords : Beed, Bolton's ratio, Tooth-size discrepancy

Citation Information : Patil HS, Handa AS, Alane UY. A Comparative Evaluation of Tooth Size Discrepancies in Different Types of Malocclusions by using Bolton's Analysis: An Odontometric Study. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2019; 13 (1):14-16.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10062-0040

License: NA

Published Online: 01-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  NA


Abstract

Patients attending orthodontic clinics normally complain of crowding or spacing or both, which represents big esthetic and functional problems. The link between the upper and lower teeth sizes and its repercussions on the occlusal harmony of these dental arches is a cause of major concern in orthodontic treatment. Hence, this study is carried out to compare the anterior and overall ratios of tooth sizes in different types of Angle's malocclusions. For this study, we examined and selected 100 patients from the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Aditya Dental College, Beed, Maharashtra, India and divided into 4 malocclusion groups namely Angle's class I (n = 25), Angle's class II (n = 50) [class II division 1 (n = 25), class II division 2 (n = 25)], Angle's class III (n = 25). For all selected patients the impressions were taken, casts were poured and models were prepared. Then the greatest width of the teeth from the first molar to the contralateral first molar was measured by using a caliper on the study models. The anterior and overall ratios between the maxillary and mandibular teeth were evaluated by using Bolton's analysis. All the parameters were subjected to statistical analysis.


PDF Share
  1. Hajar A. Tooth size discrepancy as a diagnostic tool for orthodontic treatment planning. Int Arab Jr of Dent 6(2):88-92.
  2. Radrigo HC, Waldir GJ, Fabricio PV, et al. Association between Bolton discrepancy and Angle malocclusions Braz Oral Res 2015; 29(1):1-6.
  3. Black GV. Descriptive anatomy of human teeth 4th ed. Philadelphia: SS White; pg.169.
  4. Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusions Angle Orthod 1958;28(3):113-130.
  5. Fattahi HR, Pakshir HR, Hedayati Z. Comparison of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusions Eur J Orthod 2006;28(5):491-495.
  6. Neff CW. Tailored occlusion with the anterior coefficient. Am J Orthod 1949 Apr;35(4):309-313.
  7. Lundstrom A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth alignment and occlusion Acta Odontol Scand 1955 Feb;12(3-4):265-292.
  8. Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis Am J Orthod 1962;48:504-529.
  9. Hasija N, Bala M, Goyal V. Estimation of tooth size discrepancy among different malocclusion group Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(2):82-85.
  10. Crosby DR, Alexander CG,. The occurrence of tooth size dicrepancies in different malocclusion groups Am J Orthod 1989; 95(6):457-461.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.