Immediate Implant Loading – A Paradigm Shift
S Aneja, M Rathee
Citation Information :
Aneja S, Rathee M. Immediate Implant Loading – A Paradigm Shift. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2014; 8 (1):43-46.
CC BY-NC 3.0
Copyright © 2014; The Author(s).
The marked rise in patients’ demands as regards quality of life and a good appearance makes it mandatory for the Prosthodontist to provide a dental prosthesis with optimal functional, esthetic and physiological requirements. Recent researches in dental implants advocate precise preparation of the implant bed and an adequate primary stability for more vital bone to be in contact with the implant interface facilitating immediate loading. Improvements in implant designs and surface modifications have favored reduced treatment time.
Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses: Experimental studies. J Plastic Recon Surg 1969;3:81–100.
A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387–416.
Ten year results for Branemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prostheses at implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:495–503.
Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1981;52:155–70.
Dental implants: benefit and risk. Publication 1980;81–1531. Bethesda, MD: US Dept Health and Humans Services, Government Printing Office.
Advanced surgical techniques in implant dentistry: contemporary applications of early techniques. J Dental Symposia 1993;1:16–19.
Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mat Res 1991;25:889–902.
A systematic review of marginal soft tissue at implants subjected to immediate loading or immediate restoration. Clin Oral Imp Res 2006;17(Suppl. 2):82–92.
Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. 4th ed. Blackwell publishing: Munksgaard; 1988:889–895.
Immediate implant loading: current status from available literature. Implant Dent 2007;16:235–45.
Immediate/early loading of dental implants: a report from the Sociedad Espanola de Implantes World Congress consensus meeting in Barcelona, Spain, 2002. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:57–60.
Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:109–113.
Immediate loading of modular transitional implants: a histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Perio Rest Dent 1999;19:343–53.
Immediate function of cortically anchored disk-design implants without bone augmentation in moderately to severely resorbed completely edentulous maxillae. J Oral Implant 1999;25:70–79.
Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading. A retrospective multicenter study on 226 consecutive cases. Clin Oral Imp Res 1997;8(1):48–57.
Immediate functional loading of Branemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study. Clin Oral Imp Res 1999;10:8–15.
Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micro motion of intraosseous implants. Dental Implantology Update 1993;4:77–81.
Freestanding and multiunit immediate loading of the expandable implant: an up-to-40-month prospective survival study. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:148–55.
Timing of loading and effect of micro motion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mat Res 1998;43:192–203.
Bone-implant interface structures after non tapping and tapping insertion of screw-type titanium alloy endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:339–42.
Thermal injury to bone. A vital microscopic description of heat effects. Int J Oral Surg 1982;11:115–21.
The effect of heat on bone regeneration: an experimental study in the rabbit using the bone growth chamber. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;42:705–11.
Promotion of bony in growth by frequency-specific, low-amplitude mechanical strain. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res 1994;298:165–74.
A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24–30.