Journal of Oral Health and Community Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Estimating the pH of Commercially Available Dentifrices and Evaluating its Effect on Salivary pH After Brushing

P Gulati, S Dhingra, S Chand, Swatika

Citation Information : Gulati P, Dhingra S, Chand S, S. Estimating the pH of Commercially Available Dentifrices and Evaluating its Effect on Salivary pH After Brushing. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2013; 7 (1):12-16.

DOI: 10.5005/johcd-7-1-12

License: NA

Published Online: 01-06-2016

Copyright Statement:  NA


Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of the study was to estimate the pH of commercially available dentifrices and evaluating its effect on salivary pH after brushing

Material and Methods

60 study subjects were selected and were divided into 12 groups (each group comprises of 5 subjects). The salivary pH was directly estimated using the digital pH meter calibrated using buffers of pH 4, 7 and 22. Paired t test was used to compare the changes in the mean salivary pH after brushing in each group. One way ANOVA and Tukey's test was used to compare the changes in mean salivary pH after brushing between different groups.

Results

pH of different types of commercially available dentifrices which were used in the study was found to be 8.4, 7.9, 7.9, 6.7, 7.2, 8.3, 8.4, 7.1, 6.5, 5.6, 8.2 and 6.5 respectively. Difference in mean salivary pH after brushing was found to be statistically significant for Colgate, Neem active group, Vicco, Triguard, Colgate active salt, Dabur meswak, Dabur babool, Close-up active gel, RA Thermoseal, Dabur lal dant manjan, Colgate powder groups. Mean salivary pH (before and after brushing) between study groups showed a statistically significant difference.

Conclusion

The pH of saliva increases after brushing in each commercially available dentifrice group.


PDF Share
  1. Saliva and dental caries: diagnostic tests for normal dental practice. Int Dent J 1992;42:199–208.
  2. Critical pH in resting and stimulated whole saliva in groups of children and adults. Int J Paed Dent 2001;11:266–73.
  3. Harris and Franklin Garcia- Godoy. Primary Preventive Dentistry Sixth Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  4. Effectiveness of low cost toothbrushes, with or without dentifrice, in the removal of bacterial plaque in deciduous teeth. Pesqui. Odontol. Bras. 2003;17(1):17–23.
  5. Schweizer. United States Patent Office. Patented July 26, 1960.
  6. Evaluation of total pH and soluble and ionic fluoride concentrations in dentifrices commercially available in Brazil. Oral Health Prev Dent 2003;1(4): 283–89.
  7. Dentifrice Composition 1996.
  8. The effect of citrus juices and various mouth prophylaxes on the oral flora and saliva. J Bacteriol 1941;41(5):605–25.
  9. The effect of xylitol toothpaste on the oral cavity environment. The Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005;13(1-2):98–107.
  10. Saliva and Dental Caries. Adv Dent Res 2000;14:40–47.
  11. Biological factors in dental caries: Role of saliva and dental plaque in the dynamic process of demineralization and remineralization (part 1). J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003;28:47–52.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.