Journal of Oral Health and Community Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Pediatric Implants - A Clinical Dilemma

Brinda S. Godhi

Citation Information : Godhi BS. Pediatric Implants - A Clinical Dilemma. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2012; 6 (3):109-112.

DOI: 10.5005/johcd-6-3-109

License: NA

Published Online: 01-05-2016

Copyright Statement:  NA


Abstract

There are many diseases such as ectodermal dysplasia or oligodontia that lead to complete or partial anodontia in small children. Traumatic injuries commonly result in loss of one or more teeth in children . Such cases are usually rehabilitated by removable prosthesis which have to be refabricated from time to time to incorporate changes due to growth. Thus, it would be desirable to restore the dentition by means of implants in growing children. For this purpose it is important for a clinician to understand the amount and direction of the impending growth in a young child and how it is going to influence the ultimate position of the placed implant in the arch. This review paper focuses on the dilemma of when and where it could be possible to place implants for the growing child.


PDF Share
  1. growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. Br J Orthod 1977; 4:53–64.
  2. Implant use in Growing Patients. Treatment Planning Concerns. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:1–34.
  3. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: A longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res 1963;42:400–411.
  4. Aspects on osseointegrated implants inserted in growing jaws. A biometric and radiographic study in the young pig. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:99–109.
  5. Tissue reactions towards titanium implants inserted in growing jaws. A histological study in the pig. Clin Oral Implants Res 1993;4:65–75.
  6. The effect of osseointegrated implants on the dentoalveolar development. A clinical and radiographic study in growing pigs. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:279–286.
  7. Determining the cessation of vertical growth of the craniofacial structures to facilitate placement of single-tooth implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:59–67.
  8. Clinical and radiographic findings following placement of single-tooth implants in young patients—case reports. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1996;16:421–433.
  9. Osseointegrated implants in adolescents. An alternative in replacing missing teeth? Eur J Orthod 1994;16:84–95.
  10. Changes of anterior clinical crown height in patients provided with single-implant restorations after more than 15 years of follow-up. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:455–461.
  11. Osseointegrated implants in adolescents. An alternative in replacing missing teeth? Eur J Orthod 1994;16:84–95.
  12. Single implants in the upper incisor region and their relation to adjacent teeth. An 8-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:346–355.
  13. Orthodontic aspects of the use of oral implants in adolescents: A 10-year follow-up study. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:715–731.
  14. Changes in the natural dentition after second molar emergence 13-18 years. IADR 1979:276.
  15. Dental arch depth and width studied longitudinally from 12 years of age to adulthood. Am J Orthod 1972;62:56–66.
  16. Aging in the Craniofacial Complex Longitudinal Dental Arch Changes Through the Sixth Decade. Angle Orthodontist 2008;78(3):440–444.
  17. Changes in the maxillary and mandibular tooth size/arch length relationship from early adolescence to early adulthood. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:46–59.
  18. Jr. Adult Growth, Aging, and the Single-Tooth Implant. The Int J Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2000; 15(2):252–260.
  19. Postnatal Growth and Development of the Maxillary Complex, monograph 6, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ of Michigan Press 1976:61–99.
  20. Facial Development, Continuous tooth eruption, and mesial drift as compromising factors for implant placement. Int J of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2006;21:867–78.
  21. Continued eruption of maxillary incisors and first molars in girls from 9 to 25 years, studies by the implant method. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:245–56.
  22. Facial growth in males 16 to 20 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:200–206.
  23. Facial growth in females 14 to 20 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:248–254.
  24. Tooth Movements Adjacent to Single-Implant Restorations After More Than 15 Years of Follow-up. The Int J Prosthodont 2007;20(6):626–632.
  25. Roentgen-cephalometric standards for a Swedish population. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:370–389.
  26. Endosseous titanium implants during and after orthodontic load—an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1993; 4:76–82.
  27. Clinical and radiographic findings following placement of single-tooth implants in young patients-case reports.” Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1996;16:421–433.
  28. a treatise on the continuum of growth in the aging craniofacial skeleton. Ann Arbor, university of Michigan, Center for human growth and development 1985.
  29. A longitudinal study of occlusion and tooth eruption in relation to skeletal maturation. Am J Orthod 1959;45:847–855.
  30. A study of the relationship between tooth eruption age, skeletal developmental age, and chronological age in 61 Atlanta children. Am J Orthod 1958;44:687–91.
  31. Vertical change in osseous and odontic portions of the human face between the ages of 5 and 15 years. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1966;52:902 921.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.