Journal of Oral Health and Community Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Oral Health Status and Treatment Needs Among the Nursing Students and Nursing Staff in Chennai

Navin Anand Ingle, S Srinidhi, Preetha Elizebeth Chaly

Citation Information : Ingle NA, Srinidhi S, Chaly PE. Oral Health Status and Treatment Needs Among the Nursing Students and Nursing Staff in Chennai. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2012; 6 (2):79-85.

DOI: 10.5005/johcd-6-2-79

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-05-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

As oral health and general health are interrelated, a preventive approach consisting of daily oral hygiene procedures and regular check-ups can stabilize progressive lesions. Aim of this study was to assess oral health status, treatment needs and attitude to oral care among nursing students and nursing staff in Chennai.

Material and Methods

A cross sectional study was carried out. Based on prevalence obtained for dental caries, it was decided to take sample size of 400 each for nursing students (final year) and nursing staff. Cluster sampling methodology was used to select samples. Each nursing college and hospital formed a cluster. Subjects were clinically examined according to WHO 1997 assessment form.

Results

Among nursing students, 17% and among nursing staff 10.3% had healthy periodontal tissue (code 0). Majority of nursing students and nursing staff showed high prevalence for bleeding (code 1) 45.5% among nursing students and 40.1% among nursing staff. Prevalence of shallow pockets (code 3) and deep pockets (code 4) were seen among 0.3% and 0% of nursing students and among nursing staff it was seen that about 8.8% and 0.8%, had shallow and deep pockets. Mean number of sextants with code 1 or higher and code 3 or higher was more in nursing staff compared to nursing students and the difference was statistically significant. Among nursing students and nursing staff prevalence of loss of attachment was not of significance. Mean DMFT was 1.69±1.65 among nursing students and it was higher compared to nursing staff being 1.29±1.59 and difference was found to be statistically highly significant. Among nursing students one surface, two surfaces filling were required by 23.5% and 11.5% of subjects, respectively. Among nursing staff one surface restoration and two surface restorations were required by 9.3% and 3.0% of study subjects, respectively.

Conclusion

Present study provided data on oral health status and treatment needs of nursing students and nursing staff in Chennai. In conclusion, results of study show that periodontal disease and dental caries are not major public health problems which need immediate attention among nursing students and nursing staffs.


PDF Share
  1. The global burden of oral diseases and risk to oral health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 200; 83 (9):661–669.
  2. , Besostri A. and Strohnenger L. et al. Oral health problems and needs in nursing home residents in northern Italy. Community Dental Health 2008;(25):231–236.
  3. Concepts in dental public health
  4. A cross sectional study of the oral health care. A competitive study of registered nurses, nursing assistants and home care aides. Gerodontology 1997;July 141 :28–32
  5. R and Schou. L. An exploratory study of barriers to promoting oral hygiene through carers of elderly people. Community Dental Health 1992;9 343–348.
  6. , Hyder Ali K.H Shaikh, Pushpanjali. Knowledge, attitude and practice of oral health among nursing staff and nursing students of banglore city. Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry. 2008 (11):17–21.
  7. Oral Health Surveys. Basic Methods. 4 th ed. Geneva :WHO, 1997.
  8. C and Fiske. J. Oral care of people with disability : a qualitative exploration of the views of nursing staff. Gerodontology 1994;11(1):13–17.
  9. Qualified nurses lack adequate knowledge related to oral health, resulting in inadequate oral care of patients on medical wards. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1996;24:552–560.
  10. J, Punekar S., Gosney MA. Oral care of elderly patients :nurses knowledge and views. Post Graduate Medical Journal 2000;76:89–91.
  11. Profile of periodontal conditions in a barazilian adult population. Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry. 2008;6:139–144.
  12. , Sasahara H., Kawabata K., Iwamoto Y., Konishi K., Wright F.A.C. Relationship between CPITN and oral health behavior in Japanese adults. Australian Dental Journal 1993;38(5):381–38.
  13. Jackson, Richard. C. Oliver, Harald Loe. Evaluating periodontal status of US employed adults. Journal of American Dental Association 1990;121:227–230
  14. N, Taifour D, Helderman WHP, Frenken JE. A review of oral health status in Syria. International Dental Journal. 2000;50:395–399.
  15. Javali, SB. Prasad. K.V.V Oral health in the district of Hassan, Karnataka state – An epidemiological study. Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry. 2002:15–17.
  16. Sendhil, Arun K.V. Oral health status in east coastal areas of Chennai, Tamilnadu. Journal of Indian Association of Public Health Dentistry 2002;11–15.
  17. Primary reasons for tooth extraction in Brazilian adult population. Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry. 2005;3(3):153–157.
  18. A, Safadi R.A. Coronal caries experience in dentate Jordanian adults. Community Dental Health 2008;25:50–54.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.