Journal of Oral Health and Community Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Evaluation of Three Electronic Apex Locators in Teeth with Simulated Horizontal Oblique Root Fractures

Suman Yadav, Atul Gupta, Sumeet Sharma, Sonal Soi

Citation Information : Yadav S, Gupta A, Sharma S, Soi S. The Evaluation of Three Electronic Apex Locators in Teeth with Simulated Horizontal Oblique Root Fractures. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2012; 6 (2):52-55.

DOI: 10.5005/johcd-6-2-52

License: NA

Published Online: 01-09-2015

Copyright Statement:  NA


Abstract

Aim

The accuracy of three electronic apex locators (EALs) to locate the apical limit in teeth with simulated horizontal oblique root fractures was investigated.

Material and Methods

A horizontal oblique incomplete root fracture was simulated on 30 freshly extracted maxillary anterior teeth by means of a notch made on the vestibular root plane 8 mm from the anatomic apex. The EALs investigated were the ProPex II (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), the Mini Apex Locator (Sybron Endo, Orange CA), and the Dentaport ZX (J. Morita Corp, Kyoto, Japan). The electronic measurements were compared with the real “working length.”

Results

The accuracy obtained was Dentaport ZX in 66.66% (n=20), the Mini Apex Locator in 63.33% (n=4) and the Propex II in 53.34% (n=4). The analysis of variance and chi-square test showed no statistical significant differences between Propex and Dentaport ZX EALs (Elecronic Apex Locators) at 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm tolerance levels. These results suggest that electronic apex locators can effectively and reproducibly detect oblique root fractures.

Conclusion

Although Propex II apex locator was not able to determine the working length accurately, but Dentaport ZX and Mini Apex Locator were able to determine the working length within acceptable range.


PDF Share
  1. In: weine F, ed. Endodontic Therapy, 6th edn. San Louis, MO; Mosby-Year Book, Inc., pp. 365–369.
  2. In: Ingle's Endodontics, 6th edn. BC Decker Inc., pp. 928.
  3. An in vivo comparative study of two apex locators. J Endod 1994;20(12):576–579.
  4. Comparision of radiographic and electronic working lengths. J Endod 1996;22:173–76.
  5. Comparision of measurements obtained with hand files or the Canal Leader attached to electronic apex locators: an in vitro study. Int Endod J 1999;32(2):103–07.
  6. Position of the apical foramen in relation to endodontic therapy. J Can Dent Assoc 1971;37:305–18.
  7. Exact methods of locating the apical foramen. J Natl Dent Assoc 1918;5:815–19.
  8. A new method for measuring the length of the root canal. J Dent Res 1962;41:375–87.
  9. Accuracy of the Justy II Apex Locator in determining working length in simulated horizontal and vertical fractures. Int Endod J 2004;37:174–77.
  10. Accuracy of three different electronic apex locators in detecting simulated horizontal and vertical root fractures. Aust Endod J 2006;32:64–69.
  11. Intraalveolar root fractures: radiographic and histologic study of 50 cases. J Oral Surg 1967;25:414–26.
  12. The Evaluation of Four Electronic Apex Locators in Teeth with Simulated Horizontal Oblique Root Fractures. J Endod 2008;34:1497–99.
  13. Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth. Ed 3. Copenhaguen: Munksgaard; 1994.
  14. Conservative endodontic treatment of teeth fractured in the middle or apical part of the root. Dent Traumatol 2004;20:261–69.
  15. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of three electronic apex locators. J Endod 2004; 30:231–33.
  16. An in vivo evaluation of Root ZX electronic apex locator. J Endod 1996;22:616–18.
  17. Influence of instrument size on the accuracy of different apex locators: an in vitro study. J Endod 2008;34:698–702.
  18. Influence of apical constriction diameter on Root ZX apex locator precision. J Endod 2007;33:995–998.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.