Journal of Oral Health and Community Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2011 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Traditional Pulp Vitality Testing Methods - An Overview Of Their Limitations

Balaji Subramaniyan

Citation Information : Subramaniyan B. Traditional Pulp Vitality Testing Methods - An Overview Of Their Limitations. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2011; 5 (1):12-14.

DOI: 10.5005/johcd-5-1-12

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-01-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2011; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Pulp vitality testing (PVT) is only one facet of oral diagnosis. An understanding of both the usefulness and limitations of pulp testing methods is essential if they are to be employed in clinical dentistry. Traditional methods which have been followed over the years have still been a point of controversy due to their limitations. With the advent of newer methods assessing pulpal vascularity, it is hoped that it would serve as an efficient diagnostic aid. This paper discusses the limitations of traditional pulp vitality testing methods in detail.


PDF Share
  1. Pulp testers and pulp testing with particular reference to the use of dry ice. Aust Dent J 1977;22:272–279.
  2. The role and methods of pulp testing in oral diagnosis: a review. IEJ 1982;15:1–5.
  3. Reliability of pulp-vitality testing in children: a review. ENDO (Lond Engl) 2008;2(4):205–209.
  4. Planning endodontic treatment. DCNA 1979;23:495–518.
  5. Significance of the pulp test as revealed in microscopic study of the pulps of 130 teeth. Dental Cosmos 1933;75:272–283.
  6. Reliability of various types of pulp testers as a diagnostic aid. JADA 1935;22:1559–1573.
  7. Dental vitality tests and pulp status. JADA 1973;86:409–411.
  8. The dynamics of pulp inflammation: correlations between diagnostic and actual histological findings in the pulp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1963;16:846–71,969-977.
  9. Correlation of pulpal histopathology and clinical symptoms in human teeth subjected to experimental irritation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969;27:187–201.
  10. Differential diagnosis. In The dental pulp: Biologic considerations in dental procedures. Chapter 18, 3rd edition JP Lippincott co., Philadelphipia, 2000:367–368.
  11. Diagnostic testing. In Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC. Endodontics 6. Chapter 14, Lea and febiger, Philadelphia 2008:532–546.
  12. Pulpal responses of bilateral intact teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33:797–800.
  13. Pain perception threshold and adaptation of human normal teeth. Archives of Oral Biology 1965;10:957–968.
  14. Clinical diagnostic methods. In Endodontic practice. Chapter 1, 10th edition Lea and febiger, Philadelphia 1987;17–26.
  15. Pulp responses to an electric pulp stimulator in the developing permanent anterior dentition. J Dent Child 1978;45:199–202.
  16. Differences in nerve distribution between erupted and non-erupted human teeth. J Dent Res 1969;43:406–411.
  17. Time as a factor in predicting the vitality of traumatized teeth. J Dent Child 1973;40:188–192.
  18. Effect of prolonged use of analgesics on pulpal response-a preliminary investigation. J Dent Res 1975;54:B198–200.
  19. The effect of tramadol and other analgesics on the pain threshold in human dental pulp. Arzneimittel Forschung 1978;28:181–183.
  20. The efficacy of placebo on pain perception threshold. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;20:384–391.
  21. Periodontal disease, age, and pulp status. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;19:482–493.
  22. The effect of periodontal disease on the pulp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33:458–472.
  23. Lateral dominance, pain perception and pain tolerance. J Dent Res 1972;51:940–942.
  24. Non-invasive recording of blood flow in human pulp. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:219–221.
  25. An assessment of the reliability of pulp testing deciduous teeth. Int J Pediatr Dent 1996;6:163–166.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.