Journal of Oral Health and Community Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2010 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Pit and Fissure Sealants: An Unused Caries Prevention Tool

CM Marya, Hind Pal Bhatia, P Gupta, S Dhingra, S Kataria, Meenu

Citation Information : Marya C, Bhatia HP, Gupta P, Dhingra S, Kataria S, M. Pit and Fissure Sealants: An Unused Caries Prevention Tool. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2010; 4 (1):1-6.

DOI: 10.5005/johcd-4-1-1

License: NA

Published Online: 01-09-2013

Copyright Statement:  NA


Abstract

RECOMMENDATIONS

The following recommendations are based on the evidence gathered: 1. Sealants should be placed on all permanent teeth without cavitation (i.e., teeth that are free of caries, teeth that have deep pit and fissure morphology, teeth with “sticky” fissures or teeth with stained grooves) as soon after eruption as isolation can be achieved. 2. Sealants should not be placed on partially erupted teeth or teeth with cavitation or caries of the dentin. 3. Sealants should be placed on the primary molars of children who are susceptible to caries (i.e., those with a history of caries). 4. Sealants should be placed on first and second molars within 4 years after eruption. 5. Resin-based sealants should be preferred, until such time as glass ionomer cements with better retention capacity are developed. 6. Sealants should be placed as part of an overall prevention strategy based on assessment of caries risk. Sealing is a recommended procedure to prevent caries of the occlusal surfaces of permanent molars. Though the effectiveness of sealants is obvious at high caries risk groups there is still some degree of latitudein operators preference for sealant placementand material selection.


PDF Share
  1. Occulusal fissures: Their frequency and danger. How shall they be treated? Dent Items Interest 1924;46:493.
  2. The eradication of enamel fissures. Dent Items Interest 1929;51:859.
  3. J Dent Res 1955;34:849.
  4. Composite and sealant resins-past, present and future. Pediatric Dent 1982;4:10.
  5. Relation between the form of pit and fissure and the primary lesion of caries. Dent Astr 1961;6:426.
  6. ; Chopra, R. The effect of fissure morphology and eruption time on penetration and adaptation of pit and fissure sealants: An SEM study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prevent Dent 2008:59–63 COPYRIGHT 2008 Medknow Publications Pvt. Ltd. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)
  7. An SEM study of the effects of air-polishing on fissure surfaces. Quintessence Int 1988;19:465–7.
  8. The efficiency of cleaning fissures with an air-polishing instrument. Acta Odontol Scand 1988; 46(2):113–7.
  9. The effect of air-polishing occlusal surfaces on the penetration of fissures by a sealant. Int J Pediatr Dent 1992;2(3):157–62.
  10. A scanning electron microscopic study of the effect of air polishing on the enamel-sealant surface. Quintessence Int 1990;21(3):201–6.
  11. The effect of an air-polishing device on tensile bond strength of a dental sealant. Quintessence Int 1989;20(3):211–7.
  12. The effect of an air polishing device on sealant bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:384–7.
  13. Retention of dental sealants following the use of air polishing and traditional cleaning. Dent Hyg 1988;62:402–6.
  14. Fluoride made it: why haven't sealants? JADA 1992;123(2):89–90.
  15. Air-abrasive technology: its new role in restorative dentistry. JADA 1994;125:551–7.
  16. The invasive pit and fissure sealing technique in pediatric dentistry: an SEM study of a preventive restoration. ASDC J Dent Child 1988;55(1):34–42.
  17. Pit and fissure sealant application: updating the technique. JADA 1996;127(3):351–361.
  18. Four-handed dentistry in the team practice of dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18(4):739–753.
  19. Fourhanded dentistry: the whys and wherefores. JADA 1968; 77(3):573–579.
  20. Cotton roll isolation versus Vac-Ejector isolation. ASDC J Dent Child 1989;56:438–41.
  21. Sealant retention rates of dental hygienists and dental technicians using differing training protocols. Pediatr Dent 1992;14(3):189–90.
  22. Shear bond strength of pit and fissure sealants to saliva contaminated and non-contaminated enamel. J Dent Child 2005;72:95–9.
  23. The effect of bonding agents on the microleakage and bond strength of sealant in primary teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:436–41.
  24. Effect of time from application until exposure to light on the tag lengths of a visible light-polymerized sealant. Dent Mater 1988;4:302–6.
  25. Evaluating tooth eruption on sealant efficacy. JADA 1990;121:610–4.
  26. J Public Health Dentistry 1983;33:200–204.
  27. Primary Preventive Dentistry, 5th ed. Stanford, Connecticut: Appleton and Lange, 1999.
  28. Sealantrestorations utilizing a dilute filled composite resin: one year results. Quintessence Int 1977;23:307–315.
  29. Evaluation of a restorative preventive technique for localized occlusal caries. J Dent Res 1979;58(special issue A):330 ABSTRACT 952.
  30. A clinical review of preventive resin restorations. ASDC J Dent Child 1990;57:257–259.
  31. Occlusal restoration using fissure sealant instead of ‘extension for prevention’, eighteen month results. J Dent Res 1982;61:214. ABSTRACT 324.
  32. An evaluation of sealant restorations after 2 years. Br Dent J 1999;186:569–575.
  33. The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars. A clinical trial comparing a minimal composite restoration with an occlusal amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1988;164:288–292.
  34. Preventive resin restorations utilizing a diluted filled composite resins: 30 months results. J Dent Res 1979;58(special issue A):330 (ABSTRACT No.952).
  35. Follow-up study of sealing and filling with composite resins in the prevention of occlusal caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1978;6:176–180.
  36. Preventive resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;100:535–539.
  37. Occlusal restoration using fissure sealant instead of ‘extension for prevention’. ASCD J Dent Child 1984;51:270–273.
  38. Occlusal composite restorations:4 year results. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;110:351–353.
  39. The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars. A 5-year clinical trial comparing a minimal composite with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1990;169:361–366.
  40. Composite/sealant restoration: 6.5 year results. Paed Dent 1988; 10:304–306.
  41. Preventive Resin Restorations: fracture resistance and 7-year clinical results. J Dent Res 1984;63(special issue):261 (ABSTRACT No.175).
  42. The preventive resin (composite resin/sealant) restoration: Nine-year results. Quintessence Int 1994;25:155–159.
  43. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: Nine-year results among children and adults. J Dent Child 1995;62:97–107.
  44. Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 2000.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.